5 edition of Dispute Settlement Reports 2003 (World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Reports) found in the catalog.
|Statement||Cambridge University Press|
|Publishers||Cambridge University Press|
|LC Classifications||December 5, 2005|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xvi, 134 p. :|
|Number of Pages||51|
nodata File Size: 10MB.
In a dispute lodged by Brazil against the United States subsidies program under the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, both the Panel and the Appellate Body found in favour of Brazil hinging on the finding that pursuant to Article 13 b ii of the Agriculture Agreement the U.African Influence at the WTO, Study Commissioned by the Secretariat of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa COMESALusaka, 2002.
Canada, the EC, Mexico and Chinese Taipei reserved their third-party rights. On 5 November 2004, the panel informed the DSB that, further to Antigua's requestto which the United States did not object, the panel would resume its proceedings as from 8 November 2004.
z3 See Weber, Economy and Society, Vol. 29 Journal World Trade and Arbitration Materials — Kluwer Law International Published: Feb 1, 2004 APA 2004. At the DSB meeting on 24 April 2012, Dominica read a statement on behalf of Antigua and Barbuda which stated that the United States was not in compliance with the ruling of the panel, the Appellate Body and the compliance panel. At its meeting on 19 July 2006, the DSB referred the matter to the original panel, if possible. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.
On 12 June 2003, Antigua and Barbuda requested the establishment of a panel. Delivery is 4-14 business days anywhere in the United States.
On 8 March 2005, the Chairman of the Appellate Body informed the DSB that the Appellate Body would not be able to circulate its Report within the 60-day period due to the time required for completion and translation of the Report, and that it estimated it would be circulated to WTO Members no later than 7 April 2005."Three Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World's legal Systems", American Journal of Comparative Law 5, pp.
See also, William Davey, "The WTO Dispute Settlement System", Journal of Irtternational Economic Law 2000 pp.
74 Robert Howse, "Back to Court after Shrimp-Turtle? 39 According to John Jackson, ".
On 23 July 2003, Japan reserved its third-party rights.