4 edition of E-Discovery found in the catalog.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
|Statement||American Bar Association|
|Publishers||American Bar Association|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xvi, 138 p. :|
|Number of Pages||40|
|Break up or stay together? tripping up a privilege log with an email string Ram and cache? things you did not learn in law school Discovery on e-Discovery :fishing expedition or smoking gun? Must a party preserve backup tapes? Downgrading data to inacessible format : risky business? Vendor, vendor on the wall, whos the fairest of them all? The sanctions hit parade : caveat advocatus? Does qualcomm answer the question of whether you can take comfort in the fact that morgan stanley was vacated? Must bad faith be shown to obtain sanctions against the United states? Must bad faith be shown to obtain sanctions against a party Other than the united states? Identification of key players : how far do you cast the net? Are document retention notices and key word search protocols discoverable? Concept searches : has the day arrived for computers to replace lawyers? Metadata searches : is particularized need the new standard? Does one form of production really mean just one form? Should you take a consultant to the rule 26 meet and confer session? A different form of computer monitor : how do you make sure that a party complies with e-discovery obligations? Can you use a subpoena to obtain information from an oppposing expert? Should subpoena issuers have their checkbooks ready? Are states close behind?.|
nodata File Size: 10MB.
The process begins with information governance, identification, preservation, and collection. District Court, Florida March 2005 In a lawsuit alleging accounting fraud and misrepresentation in the sale of stock, the plaintiff. Complete the following steps to create a case and add members.
Be able to focus on core activities: yes, research is essential. Since the scope of data can be overwhelming or uncertain in this phase, attempts are made to reasonably reduce the overall scope during this phase - such as limiting the identification of documents to a certain date range or custodians. Manage any case in the organization after they add themselves as a member of the case. There may come a time when TAR is so widely used that it might be unreasonable for a e-Discovery to decline to use TAR.
court in 2012, by an Irish court in 2015, and by a U. Simply moving a file to another location can modify its metadata and raise questions about its authenticity as evidence. At the state level, each state has their own set of statutes and rules that govern the procedure for civil lawsuits in state court.
Thus, despite what the Court might want a responding party to do, Sedona Principle 6 controls. It has now become a more prevalent practice, too. Processing In order to e-Discovery evidence in a forensically secure manner, ESI is often converted to forms more e-Discovery for review and analysis, often an image file.
Yet there is traction for convergence.
Offshore outsourcing to the Philippines Is it safe to outsource abroad? The result is continued confusion for litigators and most others involved, and often, the disclosure of a vast amount of irrelevant data.
The responding party could withhold or redact items containing privileged information, such as confidential communications between lawyer and client, but was obliged to furnish a log describing what had been withheld.